![[SIGN thistle header]](../../../../images/page-header-template.jpg)
|
|
Guideline
topic: Pharmacological management of asthma |
||||||||
|
Author |
Year |
Study type |
Quality rating |
Population |
Outomes measured |
Effect size |
Confidence intervals / p values |
Comments |
|
|
Simons FER et al1 |
2001 |
RCT, multicentered, placebo controlled, crossover study |
++ |
279 Asthmatic children 6-14 years, with symptoms despite BUD 400mcg/day. Children given montelukast 5mg OD or placebo for 4 weeks and then ‘crossed over’ treatments |
1] FEV1 compared with baseline 2] Home PEFR monitoring 3] asthma attack rates 4] beta2 agonist usage 5]QOLY 6] parent’s global assessment 7] physician’s global assessment 8] blood eosinophils |
*Compared
with placebo 2] difference PEFR am 9.7L/min, p=0.023, and PEFR pm 10.7L/min, p=0.012 3] montelukast 12.2 % versus 15.9% for placebo, p<0.001 4] montelukast reduced beta2 use by mean 0.33puffs/day, p=0.013 5] NS different from placebo 6] NS different from placebo 7] NS different from placebo 8] 8% reduction greater than placebo |
1] 95%ci –(0.1,2.7) 2] 95%ci; (1.4,18.1) for am and (2.4,1 9) for pm
P<0.001 |
No washout period in crossover study but outcome measured in 2nd half of each study period. Benefits of additional montelukast while statistically significant are at best modest |
|
|
Bisgaard Hans et al2 |
1999 |
RCT, crossover, double blind |
+ |
26 asthmatic children, 6-15 years, 11 on ICS, 15 ICS naïve Given 2 weeks montelukast 5mg or placebo then crossover |
1] Exhaled NO
2] FEV1 and MMEF |
*only those on ICS (n=11) 1] 22% fall ENO (placebo) 23.6% fall ENO (monte)
2] NS tendency for better values with montelukast |
Small subgroup analysis for children on ICS |
||