![[SIGN thistle header]](../../../../images/page-header-template.jpg)
|
|
Guideline
topic: Pharmacological management of asthma |
||||||||
| Author |
Year |
Study type |
Quality rating |
Population |
Outomes measured |
Effect size |
Confidence intervals / p values |
Comments |
|
| Adults |
|||||||||
| Altman1 |
1998 |
Randomised placebo controlled, double-blind comparing placebo with 10, 100, 200 mg once daily in evening, or 10 or 50 mg bd (6gps) |
++ |
Similar to Noonan |
Similar to Noonan |
Results similar as above in terms of changes in FEV1, PEFR, global assessment and beta-agonist usage, with no dose response observed. Activity domain is significantly
improved, but not on environment for QoL (for pooled data) |
CI provided in Tables |
Similar to Noonan |
|
| Fish2 |
1997 |
13 week randomised, double-blin, placebo-controlled, parallel gtroup comparing zafirlukast 20mg bd vs placebo |
+ |
N=762
(12-76 years) 514 ZAF; 248: PLAC |
Symptom score beta-agonist use AM/PM usage FEV1 daily PEFR adverse events |
Total symptom score reduction: 27 vs 13 (Z vs P) p<0.05 beta-agonist use; 3.1 vs 3.9 puffs/day p<0.01 FEV1; 3.0 vs 2.95 p<0.05 AM PEFR; 418 vs 405 p<0.05 |
Mean + - SEM shown; No. 95% CI shown |
Study has power to detect diff of 10% in FEV1. Changes achieved are small Placebo effect |
|
| Kemp3 |
1999 |
13 wk randomised placebo controlled parallel multicenter; 4 separate randomised trials |
+ |
N=261 As needed beta-agonist Steroid naïve FEV1 <60% |
Trials analysed separately and together also!! FEV1; am PEFR; Asthma symptoms |
64% increase in >10% FEV1 vs 50% for placebo FEV1 diff (95%CI) 0.01, 0.27 p=0.039 AM PEF 0.1, 7.0 p<0.001 Daytime symptom score –2.7, -0.7p=0.001 beta-agonist use-1.8, -0.6p<0.001 |
Mean SEM and 95% CI shown |
Small changes Placebo effect |
|
| Nathan4 |
1998 |
13 wk double-blind multicenter placebo controlled parallel group. ZAF 20 mg bd vs placebo |
++ |
N=454 (Z231; P223) 374 completed; >12 years; FEV1 45-80% pred; reversibility of 15% with beta-agonist; symptomatic. No oral/inhaled steroidsAsthma symptoms B2-agonist use Nasal congestion score PEFR am/pm FEV1 AQLQ |
Daytime symptoms; -23% vs-16% Night time: -18.7% vs 8.7% beta-agonist: -23.7% vs –0.6% AM PEFR:24.1 vs 13.1 p<0.01 FEV1 change; 0.05 NS QoL: overall p=0.004 (0.26 unit change) Blood eos: sign greater fall with ZAF |
Mean +- shown; No 95% CI shown. |
Study has power to detect 0.2 unit diff in asthma symptom, score Small changes observed; no sign changes in FEV1 Placebo effect |
||
| Noonan5 |
1998 |
Randomised parallel group, double blind, comparing 2, 10 or 50 mg/daily pm dose |
++ |
Chronic asthma (28-65 yrs); 40-80% pred FEV1; <15% increase in FEV1 with beta agonist; weekly daytime symptom score of >32; >1 puff of Ventolin/day; in 20% inhaled steroid permitted. |
1] Morning and evening FEV1
3] PEFR 4] Global evaluation 5] Asthma specific QoL |
Changes
in AM FEV1 not different across doses but sign diff from placebo (MEAN%
CHANGE: 6.2, 14.7, 13.5, 13.1) Improved, no dose response, except 2mg showed no effect Both am and pm PEFR sign increased equally amongst the doses. Physician ge sign with
10 & 50 mg doses of placebo |
CI provided in Tables
P<0.05 of placebo. p<0.05
p<0.05
p<0.05 |
Nearly all patients completed. Main emphasis on dose response; prob on basis of this study the 10 mg dose was used. Interest in evening FEV1 not improved: the 24 hour effect worn off then? A power of 80% for 11% change in FEV1 requred 50 in each group (70 actual in each group). Good evidence that there is a bronchodilator effect of montelukast, with improved asthma control in patients with asthma not on IS (only 20% were on IS) |
|
| Reiss6 |
1998 |
Randomised, double blind, placebo, parallel group. Comparing placebo to Montelukast 10 mg/pm dose) |
++ |
>15 years; 15% increase in FEV1 after beta agonist; moderate symptom score; at least 1 puff ventolin per day. 23% on inhaled steroids |
FEV1 and saytime symptom scores were 1 ary end-points |
13.1% increase vs placebo of 4.2% FEV1 Improvements in a, {EFR; reduction in beta-agonist use; daytime symptom score; improved QoL across all measures. |
Mean diff of 8.9% (CI 6.8 to 11%) p<0.001 |
Note 14.3% discontinuation in MON and 8.6% in placebo. Results applicable to Step 2 or 3. |
|
| Spector7 |
1994 |
6 wk randomised double-blind, placebo controlled, parallel group comparing 10, 20 or 40 mg ZAF per day with placebo |
+ |
N=276 (10 mg:68; 20 mg:68; 40 mg:70; placebo: 70). FEV1 40- 75%; FEV1 increased by 15% with beta-agonist; 18-65 years; asthma score of >10 |
Asthma symptom acore PEF am/pm Inhaler use FEV1 |
Symptoms: -28% - 8%, 09%, 010% Inhaler use: -31%, -18%, -20%, -15% AM PEF: 6%, 6%, 7%, 2% FEV1: 11%, 6%, 7%, 1% |
Mean +- SEM shown |
Well –balanced group Changes biggest with 40 mg dose Dose response with serum levels of ZAF Effectsd fairly modest, again a placebo response |
|