![[SIGN thistle header]](../../../../images/page-header-template.jpg)
|
|
Guideline
topic: Pharmacological management of asthma |
||||||||
| Author |
Year |
Study type |
Quality rating |
Population |
Outomes measured |
Effect size |
Confidence intervals / p values |
Comments |
|
| Adults |
|||||||||
| Bariffi1 |
1986 |
Randomised, comparing duovent (fenoterol plus ipratropium) vs placebo |
+ |
20 asthmatics with asthma and 20% reversibility. |
FEV1 |
At 30 min, increase of 26.2% |
P< 0.01 |
Not addressing issue of ipratropium alone |
|
| Elwood and Abboud2 |
1982 |
Double-blind randomised, cross over except for 6th visit, comparing fenoterol, ipratropium and combination. |
+ |
10 patients with chonic asthma (21-61yrs); 58% pred FEV1; > 20% increase in FEV1 with bagonist; patients on b-agonists, theophylline and BDP |
1. FEV1, FVC, FEFV (AUC over 6 hrs) |
Imratropium caused 20.1 +-6.6% increase in FEV1 AUC 100 ug Fen plus IPRA 40 ug was similar to 200 ug FENO |
P< 0.05 |
Small study, main interest was effect of combination therapy. Comparison to fenoterol, not a b-agonist used frequently in UK. |
|
| Higgins3 |
1991 |
Crossover study examining cumulative doses of salbutamol or ipra in double blind, randomised protocol |
++ |
9 patients with asthma and 10 with chronic bronchitis |
FEV1 and sGaw |
Salbutamol (5,100, 750 and 1000 ug) and ipratropium (similar doses) caused similar max increase in FEV1 (0.58 and 0.59L) in both groups. |
Date not applicable |
||
| Hockley4 |
1985 |
IPRA (80, 200, 400 ug) in 9 asthmatics D-blind, randomised, placebo controlled |
++ |
9 asthmatics |
FEV1 |
Max increase in FEV1 was 25% after 80 ug, and 30% fro the two higher doses. Duration was longer for 400ug dose). Max effect by 100 min. |
Small numbers. More effect at higher doses. |
||
| Hunt5 |
1983 |
Doses of IPRA of 40, 80, 160 ug on FEV1 in 13 asthmatics, 15 bronchitis |
+ |
FEV1 (peak change) |
Changes were 0.51, 0.64, 0.55L for the doses, change sign sustained for 3,6 and 8 hours at the increasing doses. |
Study shows the prolonged bronchodilator response with higher doses, although all doses cased similar max response. Small number of patients. |
|||
| Kreisman6 |
1984 |
Ipra (40 ug) or theophytlline or both |
+ |
12 asthmatics |
FEV1 |
By 30 min increase in FEV 1 z/fer IPRA was 11.7% |
P< 0.05 |
Small study showing bronchodilator effect, potentiated by theophylline |
|
| Burki7 |
1997 |
Randomised double blind, placebo controlled crossover |
+ |
19 patients aged 15-52 years (mean 27.7) FEV1 29 – 67 (mean 53.8) % pred. 15 % No oral steroids Compared single doses of oral theoph. and inhaled iprat., alone or in combination |
1)FEV1
at 15 min, 30 min, 1 hr, 2 hr….up to 6 hours for each regimen |
Each regimen resulted in a significant increase in FEV1 The combined regimen resulted in significantly greater effect FEV1=3.0 L (iprat.+ theoph.) vs 2.5 L (iprat.) vs 2.6L (theoph.) at 3 hrs post drug No significant side effects reported for any treatment. |
P<0.05 |
The optimum dose of theoph. was established at screening day 3, to achieve theoph. concentrations 10-20 µg/ml when 10/32 patients screened were excluded. There were 4 dosage regimes Regimen A- theoph. + inhaled placebo Regimen B- oral placebo + inh iprat. Regimen C- theoph. + inhaled iprat. Regimen D- oral and inhaled placebo Note- theophylline short-acting tablets were used |
|
| Ruffin8 |
1982 |
D-bvlind, placebo controlled, single dose of IPRA (60 ug), or feneterol (200 ug) or various combinations of each |
++ |
18 asthmatics (20% increase in Fev 1 with salb) |
FEV1 |
DATA not applicable |
|||
| Sahlstrom9 |
1986 |
Fenoterol, IPRA (40 ug) and combination compared in d-blind placebo controlled and cross over. |
++ |
24 adult asthmatics |
SGAW FEV1 |
0.53 L increase after IPRA after 2 hrs |
P< 0.001 |
Small numbers. Comparative study with combination. |
|