![[SIGN thistle header]](../../../../images/page-header-template.jpg)
|
|
Guideline
topic: Pharmacological management of asthma |
||||||||
| Author |
Year |
Study type |
Quality rating |
Population |
Outomes measured |
Effect size |
Confidence intervals / p values |
Comments |
|
| Adults |
|||||||||
| Alexander1 |
1992 |
Double-blind, placebo-controlled |
+ |
33 adult patients aged 18-65 yrs. Oral steroids 5-20 mg (mean 8.5mg/day) and high dose inhaled corticosteroids. Mean FEV1 1.7L (60% pred.) 20% reversibility to b 2-agonist |
1] am and pm PEFR |
10-12% increase |
p< 0.005 p < = 0.023 p< 0.02 |
CsA caused a progressive increase in PEFR/ FEV1 over 12 weeks which had not plateaued and persisted for at least 11 weeks following drug withdrawal. Placebo group received more oral steroids for treatment of more frequent exacerbations of asthma. Slight increase in BP, urea and creatinine with a reversible decrease in GFR seen in CsA group. |
|
| Bernstein2 |
1996 |
Double-blind placebo-controlled, parallel group 28 weeks treatment 12 week steroid reduction phase Oral gold |
+ |
279
adult patients age |
1] % of patients
achieving 50% reduction in steroid dose |
56% of patients
on gold vs 32% of patients on placebo
Twice as many GI and dermatological adverse event on gold |
p< 0.001
ns
p< 0.001 p=0.015 |
Large study show that 50% reduction in steroid dose was achieved in higher proportion of patients on gold than placebo, without a deterioration in lung function or asthma control. But gold was associated with a higher incidence of gastrointestinal and dermatological side effects. The primary end-point(50% reduction in oral steroid dose) was poorly chosen and no measure of the actual total steroid reduction achieved was provided. 32ˆ % of patients in the placebo arm asspcoated with as deterioration in asthma control. |
|
| Kishiyama3 |
1999 |
Double-blind, placebo-controlled 7 months of monthly high or low doxe IVIG vs albumin |
+ |
40 patients aged 7-66 yrs (mean age 40 yrs). Oral steroids 2.5 to 80 mg/day (mean 16.7 mg/day). Mean FEV1 2.21, ATS defined asthma. |
1] reduction in
oral steroid dose |
Nil |
Ns |
IVIG treatment provided no benefit in steroid requirement, lung function or exacerbation rate. However, IVIG was associated with an increase frequency of severe headache requiring opiate analgesia and a high rate of aseptic meningitis. |
|
| Lock4 |
1996 |
Double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group 36 233ks treatment Oral CsA |
++ |
39 adult patients aged 26-67 yrs with asthma duration 2-56 yrs Oral steroids > 5mg/day (mean 12 mg/day] for > 1 yr Mean FEV1 < 65% pred. 20% reversibility to b 2-agonist |
1] reduction in
oral steroid dose on CsA |
25% greater in
CsA than placebo |
P=0.043
|
For patients on long-term oral steroids CsA provided a steroid sparing effect during treatment, without deterioration in lung function or increase in exacerbation frequency, that did not persist once CsA withdrawn. Minor infections, hypertrichosis, parasthesia and increase in BP all more common on CsA but well tolerated. Deterioration in GFR seen on CsA treatment persistent at 4 weeks post treatment withdrawal. |
|
| Nierop5 |
1992 |
Double-blind placebo-controlled cross-over 26 weeks treatment Oral gold |
+ |
32 adult patients aged 28-72 yrs Oral steroids > 2.5 mg (mean 7.9 mg/day) and 800 mg inhaled corticosteroids Mean FEV1 60% pred. 15% reversibility to b 2-agonist |
1] reduction in
daily oral steroid dose |
4mg/day vs 0.3
mg/day on placebo |
P= 0.056
P=0.02
p< 0.001 |
Treatment with
gold reduced daily oral steroid requirement by almost half ( |
|
| Nizankowska6 |
1995 |
Double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group 34 weeks treatment (2 phases: 12 weeks efficacy and 22 weeks steroid reduction) Oral CsA |
++ |
32 adult patients
aged 25-57 yrs 27 females and 7 males |
1] PERF/FEV1/ FVC |
Nil Nil Nil Approx 25% of patients had nausea, diarrhoea, paraesthesi ae and hypertrichosis. |
Ns -1.2 to –0.1 |
During efficacy phase there was no benefit in lung function on CsA although there was an improvement in b 2-agonist use. CsA treatment allowed a reduction in oral steroid dosage which was not significantly greater than placebo. High number of aspirin sensitive asthmatics recruited due to center interest in aspirin sensitive asthma. All adverse effects resolved following CsA withdrawal. |
|