Long term follow up of survivors of childhood cancer
Section 9: Research, implementation and audit

9.1 Recommendations for research

This guideline systematically reviews the available literature and makes recommendations for the follow up of long term survivors of childhood cancer. The evidence base in this case is mainly composed of descriptive longitudinal studies. Rarely is there an appropriate control group available, so study populations are compared to population norms. Many studies report small groups of survivors from individual hospitals. The strength of these data lies in the meticulous attention to detail evidenced in reports from paediatric oncology centres. Many of the reported patients have been enrolled in national and international clinical trials. There remains a dearth of good interventional studies of therapies to prevent, treat or modify late effects in young survivors. Large multidisciplinary, national and international collaborative studies must be designed to improve the outcome for this large cohort of long term survivors. Provision of long term follow up clinics should be related to research into the long term effects of cancer and treatment.

Specifically, research is required in the following areas:

Growth:

Fertility:

Dental growth:

Cardiac problems:

Cognitive impairment:

9.2 Local implementation

Implementation of national clinical guidelines is the responsibility of local NHS organisations and is an essential part of clinical governance. It is acknowledged that not every guideline can be implemented immediately on publication, but mechanisms should be in place to ensure that the care provided is reviewed against the guideline recommendations and the reasons for any differences assessed and, where appropriate, addressed. These discussions should involve both clinical staff and management. Local arrangements may then be made to implement the national guideline in individual hospitals, units and practices, and to monitor compliance. This may be done by a variety of means including patient-specific reminders, continuing education and training, and clinical audit.

9.3 Key points for audit

Follow up outcomes should be audited carefully. As information accumulates, it will be increasingly possible to determine and deliver appropriate levels of surveillance in relation to clinical need so as to deliver high quality care in a targeted, effective and cost effective manner.

Key areas for audit are:

[Contents][Back][Top] [Next]

Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network
Home