Long term follow up of survivors of childhood cancer
Section 10: Development of the guideline

10.1 Introduction

SIGN is a collaborative network of clinicians, other healthcare professionals, and patient organisations, funded by NHS Quality Improvement Scotland. SIGN guidelines are developed by multidisciplinary groups of practising clinicians using a standard methodology based on a systematic review of the evidence. Further details about SIGN and the guideline development methodology are contained in “SIGN 50: A Guideline developer’s handbook” available at www.sign.ac.uk

10.2 The guideline development group

The membership of the guideline development group was confirmed following consultation with the member organisations of SIGN. Declarations of interests were made by all members of the guideline development group. Further details are available from the SIGN Executive. Guideline development and literature review expertise, support, and facilitation were provided by the SIGN Executive.

10.3 Systematic literature review

The evidence base for this guideline was synthesised in accordance with SIGN methodology. A systematic review of the literature was carried out. The nature of the subject, the comparatively small amount of relevant literature, and the large number of questions to be addressed made this review particularly difficult. The final search strategies were developed by the SIGN Quality and Information Director together with a member of the guideline development group. These strategies are listed on the SIGN website, in the section covering supporting material for guidelines. The outputs from these searches were sifted by the guideline development group, and all potentially relevant material evaluated.

Systematic searches were carried out on the Cochrane Library, Embase, Medline, and Psychlit and covered the period from 1993 to 2000. The main searches were supplemented by material identified by individual members of the development group. This allowed the inclusion of older seminal publications and of material published during the guideline development process, although not systematically.

10.4 Consultation and peer review

10.4.1 NATIONAL OPEN MEETING

A national open meeting is the main consultative phase of SIGN guideline development, at which the guideline development group presents its draft recommendations for the first time. The national open meeting for this guideline was held on 27 March 2002 and was attended by around 80 representatives of all the key specialties relevant to the guideline. The draft guideline was also available on the SIGN website for a limited period at this stage to allow those unable to attend the meeting to contribute to the development of the guideline.

10.4.2 SPECIALIST REVIEW

The guideline was also reviewed in draft form by a panel of independent expert referees, who were asked to comment primarily on the comprehensiveness and accuracy of interpretation of the evidence base supporting the recommendations in the guideline. SIGN is very grateful to all of these experts for their contribution to this guideline.

Comments were also received from the Scottish Cancer Group.

10.4.3 SIGN EDITORIAL GROUP

As a final quality control check, the guideline is reviewed by an Editorial Group comprising the relevant specialty representatives on SIGN Council to ensure that the specialist reviewers’ comments have been addressed adequately and that any risk of bias in the guideline development process as a whole has been minimised. The Editorial Group for this guideline was as follows:

Each member of the guideline development group then approved the final guideline for publication.

10.5 Acknowledgements

[Contents][Back][Top] [Next]

Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network
Home