Important elements
of motivational interviewing
Adapted from Miller and Rollnick, 2002.158
Portraying empathy
- use of open ended questions and avoiding premature closure
- respect for individual differences
- reflective listening so that patients sense you are trying to “get
on their wavelength”
- expressing interest/concern
- acceptance that ambivalence is normal.
Developing discrepancy
- patients are helped to see the gap between the drinking and its consequences
and their own goals/values - the gap between “where I see myself,
and where I want to be”
- enhancing their awareness of consequences, perhaps adding feedback about
medical symptoms and test results: “How does this fit in?”
“Would you like the medical research information on this?”
- weighing up the pros and cons of change and of not changing
- progressing the interview so that patients present their own reasons for
change.
Avoiding argument (“rolling with resistance”)
- resistance, if it occurs (such as arguing, denial, interrupting, ignoring)
is not dealt with head-on, but accepted as understandable, or sidestepped
by shifting focus
- labelling, such as “I think you have an alcohol problem”
is unnecessary, and can lead to counterproductive arguing.
Supporting self efficacy
- encouraging the belief that change is possible
- encouraging a collaborative approach (patients are the experts on how
they think and feel, and can choose from a menu of possibilities)
- the patient is responsible for choosing and carrying out actions towards
change.
Facilitating and reinforcing “self motivating statements”
- recognising that alcohol has caused adverse consequences
- expressing concern about effects of drinking
- expressing the intention to change
- being optimistic about change.
A tenet of motivational interviewing is “People believe what they
hear themselves say”.