Diagnosis and management of childhood otitis media in primary care
Section 7: Development of the guideline

7.1 Introduction

SIGN is a collaborative network of clinicians, other healthcare professionals, and patient organisations funded by the Scottish Executive Health Department. SIGN guidelines are developed by multidisciplinary groups of practising clinicians using a standard methodology based on a systematic review of the evidence. Further details about SIGN and the guideline development methodology are contained in “SIGN 50: A Guideline Developer’s Handbook” available at www.sign.ac.uk

7.2 The guideline development group

The membership of the guideline development group was confirmed following consultation with the member organisations of SIGN. Declarations of interests were made by all members of the guideline development group. Further details are available from the SIGN Executive.

7.3 Systematic literature review

A thorough literature search was undertaken in Medline, Embase, and Healthstar to obtain material from 1985 to 1999 inclusive. Internet searches on key websites were also conducted and passed on to the group. Additional references were identified by group members and peer reviewers. All material was assessed and evidence synthesised in accordance with SIGN methodology. Material not deemed to be of sufficient quality was discarded.

7.4 Acknowledgements

7.5 Consultation and peer review

7.5.1 NATIONAL OPEN MEETING

A national open meeting is the main consultative phase of SIGN guideline development, at which the guideline development group presents its draft recommendations for the first time. The national open meeting for this guideline was held on 15 November 2001 and was attended by 80 representatives of all the key specialties relevant to the guideline. The draft guideline was also available on the SIGN website for a limited period at this stage to allow those unable to attend the meeting to contribute to the development of the guideline. The comments received from the national open meeting were considered when the guideline was redrafted for peer review.

7.5.2 SPECIALIST REVIEWERS INVITED TO COMMENT ON THIS DRAFT

The guideline was also reviewed in draft form by a panel of independent expert referees, who were asked to comment primarily on the comprehensiveness and accuracy of interpretation of the evidence base supporting the recommendations in the guideline. SIGN is very grateful to all of these experts for their contribution to this guideline.

7.5.3 SIGN EDITORIAL GROUP

As a final quality control check, the guideline is reviewed by an Editorial Group comprising the relevant specialty representatives on SIGN Council to ensure that the peer reviewers’ comments have been addressed adequately and that any risk of bias in the guideline development process as a whole has been minimised. The Editorial Group for this guideline was as follows:

Each member of the guideline development group then approved the final guideline for publication.

[Contents][Back][Top] [Next]

Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network
Home