Guideline 65: The immediate discharge document

The immediate discharge document
References

1 Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN). Interface between the hospital and the community. The immediate discharge document. Edinburgh: SIGN; 1996. (SIGN publication no. 5). [section 1.1] [section 1.2] [section 2.2]

2 Accounts Commission for Scotland. Managing hospital admissions and discharges. Edinburgh: The Commission; 1998.

3 Scottish Office Department of Health. Patient discharge information summary. Edinburgh: The Department; 1999. [section 1.2] [section 2.6]

4 Data protection act 1998. London: The Stationery Office; 1998. [cited 11 Nov 2002]. Available from url: http://www.hmso.gov.uk/acts/acts1998/19980029.htm

5 Confidentiality and Security Advisory Group for Scotland. Protecting patient confidentiality. Final report. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive Department of Health; 2002. [cited 19 Jun 2002]. Available from url: http://www.show.scot.nhs.uk/sehd/publications/ppcr/ppcr-00.htm

6 Scottish Intercollegiate Network (SIGN). SIGN 50: A guideline developer’s handbook. Edinburgh: SIGN; 2002. (SIGN publication no. 50).

7 van Walraven C, Laupacis A, Seth R, Wells G. Dictated versus database-generated discharge summaries: a randomized clinical trial. CMAJ 1999;160:319-26. [section 2.1] [section 2.5]

8 Adhiyaman V, Oke A, White AD, Shah IU. Diagnoses in discharge communications: how far are they reliable? Int J Clin Pract 2000;54:457-8.

9 Dawson R, Iyengar N, Ferguson CJ. How good are interim discharge summaries? A prospective audit. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1998;80:229-31.

10 Macaulay EM, Cooper GG, Engeset J, Naylor AR. Prospective audit of discharge summary errors. Br J Surg 1996;83:788-90. [section 2.2] [section 2.4]

11 Sexton J, Brown A. Problems with medicines following hospital discharge: not always the patient’s fault? J Soc Adm Pharm 1999;16:199-207. [section 2.2] [section 2.6] [section 2.7]

12 van Walraven C, Rokosh E. What is necessary for high-quality discharge summaries? Am J Med Qual 1999;14:160-9.

13 Adams DC, Bristol JB, Poskitt KR. Surgical discharge summaries: improving the record. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1993;75:96-9. [section 2.3] [section 2.5]

14 Wallis C, Webster RE. Discharge letters to general practitioners: their importance and content. Care of the Critically Ill 1993;9:70-1.

15 Solomon JK, Maxwell RB, Hopkins AP. Content of a discharge summary from a medical ward: views of general practitioners and hospital doctors. J R Coll Physicians Lond 1995;29:307-10.

16 Pentland B, Hellawell DJ, Benjamin J. The Functional Assessment Measure (FIM + FAM) as part of the hospital discharge summary after brain injury rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil 1999;13:498-502.

17 Stalhammar J, Holmberg L, Svardsudd K, Tibblin G. Written communication from specialists to general practitioners in cancer care. What are the expectations and how are they met? Scand J Prim Health Care 1998;16:154-9.

18 Frain JP, Frain AE, Carr PH. Experience of medical senior house officers in preparing discharge summaries. BMJ 1996;312:350.

19 Archbold RA, Laji K, Suliman A, Ranjadayalan K, Hemingway H, Timmis AD. Evaluation of a computer-generated discharge summary for patients with acute coronary syndromes. Br J Gen Pract 1998;48:1163-4.

20 Brazy JE, Langkamp DL, Brazy ND, De Luna RF. Do primary care physicians prefer dictated or computer-generated discharge summaries? Am J Dis Child 1993;147:986-8.

21 Tosson SR. General practitioners preference to a dictated or structured discharge summary following gynaecological surgery. J Obstet Gynaecol 1996;16:288-9.

22 Bowns IR, Newton P, Long S, Walters S, Rector A, Conway JV. Testing headings for communicating the personal health record: comparison from the recipients’ perspective. Health Informatics J 1999;5:179-87.

23 Duggan C, Feldman R, Hough J, Bates I. Reducing adverse prescribing discrepancies following hospital discharge. Int J Pharm Pract 1998;6:77-82. [section 2.6] [section 2.7]

24 Carey SJ, Hall DJ. Immediate psychiatric discharge letters by fax. Scott Med J 1999;44:79-80.

25 Paterson JM, Allega RL. Improving communication between hospital and community physicians. Feasibility study of a handwritten, faxed hospital discharge summary. Discharge Summary Study Group. Can Fam Physician 1999;45:2893-9.

26 Isles C, Campbell J, Reece C. Communicating with General Practitioners: an audit of the formal discharge summary in a District General Hospital. Health Bulletin 1998;56:484-7.

27 Scottish Office Department of Health. Guidance on the use of facsimile transmissions for the transfers of personal health information within the NHS in Scotland. Edinburgh: The Department; 1997. NHS MEL (1997)45. [cited 31 May 2002]. Available from url: http://www.show.scot.nhs.uk/sehd/mels/97_45.html

28 Woolman PS, Oates J, Frame J, Hardy J. XML for immediate discharge letters in Scotland. Stud Health Technol Inform 2000;77:1040-4.

29 Cabinet Office Public Sector Team Regulatory Impact Unit. Making a difference. Reducing General Practitioner (GP) paperwork. London: The Office; 2001. [cited 26 Apr 2002]. Available from url: http://www.cabinet-office.gov.uk/regulation/publicsector/ReducingGPPaperwork.pdf

30 Davenport RJ, Dennis MS, Warlow CP. Effect of correcting outcome data for case mix: an example from stroke medicine. BMJ 1996;312:1503-5.

31 Gompertz PH, Irwin P, Morris R, Lowe D, Rutledge Z, Rudd AG, et al. Reliability and validity of the Intercollegiate Stroke Audit Package. J Eval Clin Pract 2001;7:1-11.

32 Clinical Standards Board for Scotland. Clinical standards: generic. Edinburgh: The Board; 2002. [cited 11 Nov 2002]. Available from url: http://www.clinicalstandards.org/pdf/finalstand/generic.pdf