![[SIGN thistle header]](../../../images/page-header-template.jpg)
Methodology Checklist 1: Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses
Study identification (Include author, title, year of publication, journal title, pages) |
||||
Guideline topic:
|
Key Question No: | |||
Checklist completed by: |
||||
| Section 1: Internal validity |
||||
|
In a well conducted systematic review |
In this study this criterion is: |
|||
1.1 |
The study addresses an appropriate and clearly focused question. |
Well covered Adequately addressed Poorly addressed |
Not addressed Not reported Not applicable |
|
|
1.2 |
A description of the methodology used is included. |
Well covered Adequately addressed Poorly addressed |
Not addressed Not reported Not applicable |
|
1.3 |
The literature search is sufficiently rigorous to identify all the relevant studies. |
Well covered Adequately addressed Poorly addressed |
Not addressed Not reported Not applicable |
|
1.4 |
Study quality is assessed and taken into account. |
Well covered Adequately addressed Poorly addressed |
Not addressed Not reported Not applicable |
|
1.5 |
There are enough similarities between the studies selected to make combining them reasonable. |
Well covered Adequately addressed Poorly addressed |
Not addressed Not reported Not applicable |
|
| Section 2: Overall assessment of the study |
||||
2.1 |
How well was the study done to minimise bias? Code ++, +, or - |
|||
2.2 |
If coded as +, or - what is the likely direction in which bias might affect the study results? |
|||