![[SIGN thistle header]](../../../images/page-header-template.jpg)
SIGN Guideline 119: Management of Patients with Stroke: Identification and Management of Dysphagia
Guideline Index Page | SIGN Methodology
Key question |
See guideline section |
|
1. |
How should stroke patients be assessed for nutritional status in order to identify patients at risk who require nutritional intervention? |
|
2. |
In stroke patients who cannot swallow adequately, what is the evidence for the effectiveness of the following therapies?
|
|
3. |
Is there evidence that stroke patients, who are nutritionally at risk and/or dysphagic, benefit from nutritional supplementation, food fortification, or dietary advice? Specify setting. |
|
An example standard protocol for the modified barium swallow assessment using videofluoroscopy (adapted from a published protocol): 153 |
Lateral projection, patient sitting in usual position of comfort |
ORAL PHASE |
||||||
NORMAL |
ABNORMAL *NFR |
ABNORMAL |
LIQUID |
PASTE |
SOLID |
|
LIP SEAL |
||||||
CHEWING ACTION |
||||||
ORAL CONTROL OF BOLUS |
||||||
LOSS OF BOLUS TO PHARYNX |
||||||
TONGUE STRIPPING ACTION |
||||||
PHARYNGEAL PHASE |
||||||
TRIGGERING OF SWALLOW REFLEX |
||||||
RESIDUE |
||||||
CRICOPHARYNGEAL FUNCTION |
||||||
LARYNGEAL ELEVATION |
||||||
PHARYNGEAL PHASE (ANTERO-POSTERIOR VIEW) |
||||||
HEMIPARESIS |
||||||
LARYNGEAL CLOSURE |
||||||
RESIDUE ON VOCAL CORDS |
||||||
ASPIRATION |
||||||
POTENTIAL/OBSERVED (P/O) : BEFORE SWALLOW |
||||||
(NORMAL = 1 P = 2 O = 3) : DURING SWALLOW |
||||||
: AFTER SWALLOW |
||||||
*NFR = Not Functionally Relevant |
||||||
Additions to standard procedure: |
||||||
Further comments: |
||||||
Signed: |
||||||
Source: Dunnet & Sellars 1990 unpublished study. It is advised that clear criteria be established for each category of answer in order to provide rating consistency. |
||||||
TEXTURE MODIFICATION - FOOD |
||
TEXTURE |
DESCRIPTION OF FOOD TEXTURE |
FOOD EXAMPLES |
A |
|
|
B |
|
|
C |
|
|
D |
|
|
E |
|
|
Normal |
Any foods |
Include all foods from “High Risk Foods” list |
From the British Dietetic Association and the Royal College of Speech and Language Therapists joint document: National Descriptors for Texture Modification in Adults, 2002.115 |
||
HIGH RISK FOODS |
Stringy, fibrous texture including pineapple, runner beans, celery, lettuce |
Vegetable and fruit skins including beans (eg broad, baked, soya, black-eye), peas, grapes |
Mixed consistency foods including cereals which do not blend with milk, (eg muesli), mince with thin gravy, soup with lumps |
Crunchy foods including toast, flaky pastry, dry biscuits, crisps |
Crumbly items including bread crusts, pie crusts, crumble, dry biscuits |
Hard foods including boiled and chewy sweets and toffees, nuts and seeds |
Husks including sweetcorn and granary bread |
TEXTURE MODIFICATION - FLUID |
||
TEXTURE |
DESCRIPTION OF FLUID TEXTURE |
FLUID EXAMPLES |
Thin fluid |
still water |
water, tea, coffee without milk, diluted squash,spirits, wine |
Naturally thick fluid |
product leaves a coating on an empty glass |
full cream milk, cream liqueurs, Complan, Build Up (made to instructions), Nutriment, commercial sip feeds |
Thickened fluid
Stage 1 =
Stage 2 =
Stage 3 = |
Fluid to which a commercial thickener has been added to thicken consistency
|
|
NHS Quality Improvement Scotland, has produced clinical standards on “Food, Fluids and Nutritional Care in Hospitals” (www.nhshealthquality.org).117 |
||
Guideline Index Page | SIGN Methodology
Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network,
Elliott House, 8-10 Hillside Crescent,
Edinburgh EH7 5EA
Tel. 0131 623 4720 Fax. 0131 623 4503 Web contact duncan.service@nhs.net
Last modified
27/02/12
© SIGN 2001-2012